Across the Yard

As mentioned in previous posts, this year's photo shoot at the Detroit Model Railroad Club, for me, was successful.  Many of the shots turned out like this one, that is the photo is sharp and the likability of the subject is up to the viewer.
This year, I was trying for different areas on the layout.  I have some older shots of this area, but not with this setup of trains.  In the original shot, the background wall didn't do me any favors.  The focus stacking played some odd tricks with the flat blue color.  Lately I've been getting a bit more aggressive with cropping, and that allowed me to do the same here.
This is the shot coming out of the stack process.

ISO 100, f/6.3, 1.6 sec, 50 mm

16 Shot Photo Stack

All that stuff in the upper right looks bad.  That boys and girls is what a dirty sensor photo looks like.  In this case, it is not.
At first, I tried to clone it out to keep some originality.  And in the end, it looked worse.
Next I tried sky replacement.  I spent quite a bit of time erasing the background, more time than I like on any photograph.  I wound up erasing more and more of the background.  With what I think the format that the club likes, this is what I finished up with.

To me there's not enough to distract, but if I was to re-edit I'd lighten the blue a bit.  Other than that, the photo is OK.  Just OK.
But, since I've been cropping to a size that is more monitor friendly I might be able to get that mess totally out of there.

Actually, this looks so much better to me.  No background, all subject scenery.
I'm not sure why I'm not totally happy with this shot.  On my screen saver, it is sharp.  All the numbers are clearly readable.  All the tracks are in focus.  Still not happy.  I think, it is because it looks indoors?  The light ain't right.
I could play with the light levels, or......  I like what B&W or monochrome effects did for the F15 shot.  (Here)  After all, this is a railroad shot.  Looks way too clean.
This is what I finished with.

Now this looks a little more like a railroad yard shot to me, or what I think it would look like.  I need to expand my horizons more.

Because I was Inverted.....

One of the best movie scenes ever comes from the movie Top Gun.  With a rumor of Top Gun II, I'll have to say one of the best scenes ever comes from the movie, the original Top Gun.

So the saying 'Because I was Inverted" was all over Reno.  Tee shirts, mugs and probably one piece baby outfits were outfitted with this.
The air racers never inverted, but the show performers would often fly with their gear above the cockpit.  And I guess since the 'original' Top Gun film, no airshow is complete without the reenactment of the maneuver.

ISO 400, f/8, 1/2500 sec, 450 mm

Photographically speaking, again, I could shave some speed in favor of ISO on this day.  From many of the shots, the morning and early afternoon sky is virtually cloudless.  In many shots, I was using ISO 800 and getting crazy speeds.  I think I could get away with 200 ISO on sunny days and 400 ISO whenever a cloud gets lost and shows up over the field.  (I put this in so when I read this a year from now I can read it and still forget it before the next show.)  I think if I need a speed bump with those settings, I can go f/11 or so.  It doesn't show up much here, but when looking very close the image noise shows up.  Some post processing cleanup helps, but a lower ISO would go a long way.

F15 - The Story

Like a lot of people, I like fast.  I should say, I like to watch fast.  If it's noisy, so much the better.  And if it's the Sound of Freedom, home run!
Of all the aircraft I've seen in action or close up, my favorite by far it is the F4 Phantom.  If you're not up on your USAF fighter life cycle, the Phantom was retired from the US inventory many years ago.  However, I did get to see them fly when I was stationed in Okinawa in the early 80's.  They were being phased out at the time by the F15s.   But to watch them fly, I really liked the lines.  Just plain bad ass.  No other description necessary.

This is a photo from 1981.  Film.  Rookie.  Anyway, I was on a flight from Okinawa to the Philippines on a KC-135, and this was one of our gas guzzling customers.  On the same flight:

As with many things in life, once you begin to like them they go away.  So long gone is the F4, unless one is flying around somewhere that I've lost track of.   It looks like some other countries may still employ the aircraft, but the last use in the US for the Phantom was for drone practice.
Anyway, segueing into a F15 story, the F4s in Okinawa were being replaced by the F15s.  Although I liked the lines of the Phantom more than the Eagle, the Eagle appeared to have the performance edge by a wide margin.  When the F15s required a functional flight test after major maintenance, free flight time was granted over the field.  What a show!  And it is that sound I remember.
So I'm at the Reno Air Races a few weeks ago.  I knew that there was a F16 Demo team that had time every day on the schedule of events, and I was looking forward to seeing them perform.  Fighters were going to be seen.
At the end of the first day, I was 'recovering' with friends at a campsite.  The campsite was really a parking lot for the airfield just off the runway.  
Then I heard it.  
There are many engine sounds I remember from over the years.  By far, the most enjoyable to me is the C5 whine.  Hours of touch and goes.  I have no idea on the number of take-offs, but there were lots.  And with each acceleration the dump of fuel into the TF39s to get them off the ground produced a sound I'll never forget.  Close seconds go to the F4, the F15 and the SR-71.  I always keep asking myself, how did I get this lucky to see all of these engineering marvels do their thing?  
So, back to the campsite, I hear a familiar noise.  There are two F15s doing a flyby of the field!  Awesome.
So two Eagles arrived.  I was hoping I'd see them as part of the performances between races, but it was not to be.  They sat next to the F16s on the military side of the spectator area for the remainer of the event.  But I paid them a visit every day.

Other than to me, not much of an interesting photograph.  For whatever reason, I missed centering it.  And one of the lessons I need to remind myself, don't get so close up that there's no room to maneuver.  I needed to leave more room off the right side wing.  I pretty much limited my options.  The other self criticism is I'm just off center enough to be irritating.  Not a side shot, not a nose shot, no-man's land.  PPPFFFTTT.
I don't want to lose this shot, I'd like to do anything with it to keep it alive, only for the subject.
Before we too deep into this, there are a lot of  small 'imperfections' that need to be removed.  Anything that is between the wing underside and above the taxiway above the grass needs to be 'gone'.  
Once those were removed, I really want to center the attention on the aircraft.  Sky is nice, the mountains are nice.  It is possible someone's eye could drift off the prize.
I was playing around with a number of filters, when I landed on doing a B&W theme.  I don't do many like that, but in this case it works.  Kind of artsy, eh?

ISO 200, f/9, 1/1250 sec, 70 mm

D90/18-200

In a perfect world, I'd leave more room off each wing.  It almost looks like the wings end with the flaps.  If I ever do a redux, I'd start with the wing tips.  But for now, I like the effect.  There was another effect, which I might work with which was very harsh.  Really brought out the clouds and mountains.  it's from one of my older filters that I started to shy away from, but again with this subject harsh works.  On another rainy, snowy day.

USAF Heritage Flight - P51 and F16

One of the Air Races non-race activities this year was a flight by the F16 Viper Demonstration Team, and as a part of that show is a fly by of the Falcon with an aircraft from the USAF history.  In this show, it was with a P51 Mustang.
For me, it is one thing to see the F16 demo flight, which was awesome,  and see the P51s in the races.  It is altogether a different sight to see the two craft together.  See kids, history can be fun.
Photographically speaking, two things.  There won't be many more memories I will have from this event that what I saw here.  Sure, the races are fun, interesting and exciting.  To me however, this is another level.  And the fact I could capture the image is even better.  I won't mention that there were four shows, one a day, and after the first I knew what was coming.  Still, there was room for error.  The other thing, I'm always amazed at what light, glass and electronics will capture.  It is tough to tell how far away I am from the subjects, but through all the photography elements the pilot of the F16 is really very visible.  That is just awesome.
The only 'touch ups' I did was to add some light to the F16 tail as it was dark due to sun position.  There were also sun reflections on the canopies of both aircraft.  Again, due to the distance involved, to get the final image I'd be happy with I need to crop a little more than I'm used to.  With the crop, it has to fit as a screen saver on my 24 inch monitors, that's the test.
From the original image, the blown sun reflections:

I was surprised a bit by how much the light objects impacted the image.  All were very small, but they were eye catchers.  For the sun reflection on the canopy, I used the Content Aware Fill process.  In this case, surprisingly it worked very well.  I used the same process for the very light object inside the cockpit.  I used a small clone adjustment for the sun reflection on the pilot's helmet.

As part of my post processing, I also hit the image with a bit of smoothing.   The 'perfect' sky wasn't so perfect to me.  It these two close ups, you can really see the noise in the original image and in the processed image, not so much.
Usually when I process my photos, I go from the original 300 PP to 150 PP.  It used to be for image file size considerations.  I could very rarely tell the difference.  But for this image, I was going to crop off a lot more than I usually do.  So I kept the 300 PP and saved at a higher JPG resolution.  Seems to have worked.  From what I can tell, it will work on my monitors, and that's the final test.
The final image.

ISO 800, f/6.3, 1/6400 sec, 450 mm

To my 'critic' friends who would say something along the lines of nice photograph, but if you were really any good, you wouldn't need that shutter speed.  In fact, if you were to slow it down to 1/100th, maybe you'd get some prop blur.  Maybe, but at this angle the prop blur or lack thereof isn't noticeable.  But I'll keep it in mind for next year.

Walking Bridge into Fall

Fall is just around the corner - or maybe here already and the trees in my yard just didn't get the memo yet.  I equate fall to the change of color in the trees.  For mid-Michigan, the turn is generally the second week in October.  And of course, work will interfere with and extended fall foliage trip next weekend, but we'll see what can be worked out.
So this is a photo from the past, 2011.  The camera then was the D90 with the 18-200 lens.
As I look back at my photography history, I've gone through phases of file collection.  By the time I started using the D90, I was all into RAW files, but I would often change back and forth whether or not I would also create a JPG file.
Early on, I'd look at the JPG and use it as a reference to what I had created from the RAW file.  In the end, it turned out I was never happy with the JPG and I quit creating them.  But as I go back through my old files, when I do find a JPG file I'm happy to see it.
So, today as I was looking for a fall themed photo to play with I found this one from 2011 and a corresponding JPG.
From the set of shots that I took this day, I found some old one I'd 'touched up' and it was a bit on the funny side, as they were pretty much all 'grunge' settings from Photomatix.  Ah, the good ol' days.
This is the original JPG from 2011.

ISO 400, f/9, 1/40 sec, 18 mm

I think it is nice fall photo, but needs lots of 'little' tweaks.
First, the close bridge supports need to be straightened,  The 18 mm lens distortion is a bit annoying.  If I can't straighten them, I could crop them out, but I'd like to keep some part of them for framing reference.
I need to do something with the wood bridge.  I'd like some heavy contrast to bring out the grain, but that might not go well with the foliage.  Doable.
I also need to pop the foliage colors a bit.  It's fall, celebrate!
I used ACR to adjust the lens corrections, to straighten the bridge posts and to pop the colors a bit.  I used On One to create a layer mask over the bridge to increase the contrast on the wood and metal.
This is what I cane up with.

And the trees look a bit more upright as well.
Welcome to Fall.

Williamsburg Governor's Palace - North Side

At last night's photo club meeting I volunteered to do a demo on Adobe Camera Raw (ACR).  We have some new members who don't understand what it does, other than it annoys them.  We have members who use PS and Elements, so this 'discussion' will be beneficial to both groups.  My 'discussion' will be in essentially five weeks.  Unlike my school days, I will try to prepare more than a day out.
Since any chat about ACR on its own might take 20-30 minutes, I'll have to do some demoing.  That can fill up the other 90 minutes.
Tonight I was looking for RAW file images to use.  My criteria was to have some dynamic range, but not outrageous.  For the club, I want to use a somewhat realistic image not one that was deliberately taken to prove a point.
This is a photograph of the Governor's Palace in Williamsburg, Virginia.  Most people approach the Palace from the south side, main entrance.  Apparently I got lost and found my way to the lesser known north side.
I like this landscape shot.  Nice carpet of grass, bricks for detail, a not very common gold seal on the doorway and most importantly a sky that I won't have to replace.  There is a landscape dude that will have to be dealt with by some form of removal or crop.  We'll go for removal because I like a challenge, plus for the club I have cred that needs a bolster every now and then.
Here is the original image.

May 19, 2016 - I did have the D7200 at that time.  The lens is my 18-200.  ISO 400, f/11, 1/250 sec, 38 mm.

First step - open RAW image file in ACR.

There are two settings in ACR that I know of that are not available once the image is imported to PS.  I need to make my selections here.  I also do my initial light level sets.

First I will set the profile to Adobe Landscape.  For my light levels, I just hit the Auto setting.  First pass, I'll detail it later.

In this image, that is not so necessary, but is some other darker images this step will at least let me see what is there.  

The options that are not available later are the lens corrections.  I need to set them now.

I want to use this options to remove chromatic aberrations and enable profile corrections.  (It will change the image!)

From here I will take the corrections and open PS.

PS will open with the image as the Background layer.  As practice, I never work on the background layer, so I make a copy layer using the shortcut Ctrl+J.  Layer 1 is created.  Again as practice, I make Layer 1 a Smart Object.  This will allow me to make changes at a later time if necessary.

At this time I will open the RAW Editor Filter.  This is ACR inside PS, except for the two parameters I've already changed in Lens Correction.  I'll use the shortcut Shift+Ctrl+A to open the editor.

From here, I'll set the temperature and tint levels.  For this shot, I'll bump the temperature a bit, to give the illusion of some sun light.

I'll also move the other light levels as necessary.  I want a good photograph with a good sky.  No blown pixels, some (small) black areas are OK.  I'll also set my Clarity, Dehaze, Vibrance and Saturation.

When the colors and light levels are set, I move to sharpening.  For this, I generally use the heavy preset.

From here, I'll move to the Transform section.  Because I've already it the image with Lens Correction, there won't be much change unless the level is off.  I start off with the 'waffle' selection.  Unless I'm off at an extreme angle this will do the trick.

Nothing can ruin a good photo like spots.  Dirty lens, dust on the sensor, even a small flying critter will subconsciously catch an eye.  I always check for spots in the sky.  ACR makes this really easy to do with the spot removal tool and the Visualize Spots option checked.

No odd images in the sky.

Last stop in ACR is the Adjustment brush.  I didn't make any spot changes.  Usually when I do, it will be to over or under expose a small area.  There are some dark areas in the image, but non that I want to tackle.

At this point the image is basically done.

For the final touch, I need to remove the lawn service dude.  It would easy to crop the image and remove him.  But the Content Aware Fill option worked really well.  I did some touch up cloning along the brick wall just for fun and practice.  I also removed the top of the lightning rod that extends out of the picture.  Personal preference, not real fond of items that extend out of the photo if I can avoid it.  I'll finish by cropping it to 1920x1080 and adding the frame.

Fun image to work on.  Little bits of everything.

BUFF - Older is Better

As I log more time above the daises every day, I appreciate the memories archived in my mind even more.  I don't see as many air planes as I used too.  And I don't see as many of the military variety.  So, when I do get a planned chance or even better an unplanned chance, it is always a wonderful trip down memory lane.
I have wonderful memories of watching the BUFFs (B-52) making Okinawa a temporary home when Anderson Field in Guam would evacuate in the face of a typhoon.  The paint scheme was slightly different in the 80s.  There was also more smoke from the engines.  The planes would park on the same side of the base where I worked as "we" were both attached to SAC.  Back then my days would begin with a FOD walk in our area.  When the BUFFs were there, we'd walk right in front and back of these magnificent craft.  Memories.
Something else to that I never lose track of.  With the advancement of computers and aerodynamic studies, this is a 1950s design.  Slide rules.  Draft paper.  Sharp Pencils.  And in the next 50+ years nothing better has come along.  Yea, there are other more modern designs, but this is still a front line asset.
So to the memories, I remember the approaches and take offs from Okinawa.  Lots of smoke.  My plane at the time, KC-135, was a smoker as well.
When I was at the Air Races a few weeks ago, there was a B-52 fly over.  These two shots are from the air plane doing a slow pass dirty, hanging gear and flaps.  The noise was awesome!
On approach, here is the sight - and the smoke.

ISO 800, f8, 1/800 sec, 600 mm

And the overhead pass.

ISO 800, f/8, 1/500 sec, 480 mm

And the noise.  With engine upgrades over the years, it isn't quite the same sound as I remember - but close enough.  Nice time travel for me.

B&O Across the River

I am fortunate to still be able to more around somewhat 'nimbly' when taking photos of the model trains at the DMRRC.  That is to say, I can walk hunched over, carrying camera, tripod and tablet for a very short distance.  That ain't easy trying to navigate through a four foot high 'walk' way.  But as it is, the effort is worth it.  I can take photos from angles that generally aren't available to the public.
This is one of them.
In past years, I have used a bean bag at ground level to steady the camera in order to get closer to 'eye' level of the trains.  This year I wanted to get some height off the tracks.  That would help with minimum focus issues and give me a slightly different view.  With the tripod I used which is fairly flat, the battery pack and the camera, I was about 5 inches off the track.  That was OK, but not what I really was looking for.  Next year I'll lose the battery pack and get an inch closer.  That might get the look I'm after for some of these shots.
In this shot, all that doesn't matter.  Ha.  This is shooting if not level, only slightly downward.  While the top of the train is in view, it isn't the focus of the scene.  Although the train appears to be slightly banking inward, I'm OK with it.
There is a lot of 'clean-up' from the original that is required.  I'm finding on many of the pictures from the DMRRC, the ceiling lights are casting 'ghosts' that I don't like on some surfaces.  You may not notice it until it is pointed out - but now the lights are pointed out.  There are also some loose electrical wires under the bridge that clearly needed to be removed.
This is the original with the touch up area noted:

I used clone and content aware fill tools to remove the wires and at least dull the ceiling light reflections.  Both issues will show up when the image is cropped and some color/sharpening are added in.
The final image:

ISO 100, f/6.3, 1.6 sec, 50 mm

Focus Stack - 9 Images

I like the B&O colors of these trains, so I'm a bit partial when I say this is one of the better shots of the night.

Cormorant taking Flight

This is another chapter in the lesson of patience.  
I'm guessing this is a Double Crested Cormorant.  The bird is said to be local in great numbers.  It looks like what I see in Wikipedia.
Back to patience.  As I was moving slowly through the Refuge, I could see a number of these Cormorants in various locations.  This one I saw just paddling around.  He/she/it looked like flight was soon and I decided to wait.  And wait.  And wait.  Realistically it was only a few minutes, but it did seem like a long time.  And wait.
I don't have any avian transitional images.  The birds are either on the ground/water or not.  I have seen wonderful shots of avian take offs, landings and attacks.  Again, I have none of those.
I was not going to be denied at this time, I knew flight was soon by this one.
And now I have an Avian takeoff.
This was at 9:00 AM on a very cloudy morning.  The light was really crappy and cast a bad color on the water.  Hey, its Michigan.  Doesn't matter, I have my action takeoff.
With light this bad, thank goodness for RAW.  A lot of times, I will try Photomatix to help with light levels.  When I use this method, I usually end up with a harsh image which I normally like.  However with the nature shots, I'm now leaning to a softer, more realistic look.  Unless......
But I want this as real as I can get.  No funny business.

ISO 400, f/5.6, 1/1000 sec, 450 mm

Not very colorful.  I have a few with a group of Cormorants that has better color, but for now, I have my Avian Takeoff.

Five T6s in a Turn

The series of air races is 6 to 7 laps per heat.  The race courses, depending on class are anywhere between 3 and 8 miles per lap.  That is more than enough time for the racers to sort them selves for finishes.  Much like the more popular NASCAR races, the start of the air race is closely monitored.  Every race has a 'starter' that is in a faster aircraft that is in the air at the same time of the race whose responsibility at the start is to make sure everyone is in the right place.  The radio chatter is fun to listen to, as you can hear the starter talk to each air craft and tell them to move up, back or stay in a lane.  Depending on the type of aircraft and race, the staging area is in different locations relative to the viewing grand stands.  
The two areas of staging are southeast of the stands, and to the west.
For races starting behind the stands, you can hear them coming and you see the aircraft starting the race.  For the races starting to the west, the aircraft start by crossing in front of the grand stands.  This start is usually for the races on the shorter courses.  Another reason I like the T6 races.
Like NASCAR, there are rules to the start.  There has to be some control over a number of vehicle that weigh several hundred pounds, going faster than NASCAR vehicles to get a good race start without incident.
The first two laps provide the best opportunity to catch multiple aircraft on a single frame.  As the race goes on, the aircraft space themselves.  On occasion, two or more aircraft will battle for a position, or lap a slower racer and the crowd goes nuts.
The T6 class starts their races to the west meaning that all the racers start by passing in front of the grand stands.  Bingo!
After the first day excitement of the races, I started looking for multiple aircraft in a single frame.  The more, the better.

ISO 800, f/6.3, 1/8000 sec, 225 mm

The speed of the shot is probably overkill, but by this time I'd settled on ISO 800 for the day.  Next time sunny days will be ISO 400 and I can probably keep enough speed.  Rookie stuff.  I tried to keep at f/6.3 to f/8 as that is close to the best image for the lens.

Northwestern on Trestle

One of the fascinating features, to me, at the DMRRC are the trestle bridges.  The detail involved is amazing to me.  I'd like to think the trestles were hand built - and if they're not, please don't confuse me with the facts.  All that is missing for me is the noise of the metal and wood when the trains are moving.  Takes me back to riding roller-coasters on wood frames.
I like the looks of the Northwestern Engine.   The frontal view can be seen here.  The detail lines of the Engine are so unique.  And for the most part, from what I can tell, this engine is not weathered.
I never know if everyone 'likes' my take on photographs.  This is the photograph that is available to the DMRRC club - if they like straight photographs.

ISO 100, f/6.3, 4 sec, 50 mm

Manual, 11 shot focus stack

The house and train are too clean and shiny.
To me, this scene cries out for some high contrast to bring out the rock features, the house definition and whatever I can find in the trestle.  We need to age the scene a little.
I tried Photomatix and that adventure was like Goldilocks and the Bears.  Just couldn't find the right mix to get the rocks and the train right.  There were some interesting combinations of highlight and shadow lights and I might have used one or a mix if I wanted to do a dawn or dusk scene.  I wanted to keep this light relatively even and daylight.  In my head, there is a lot of detail.
I tried my On One sharpening and color fixers, and again - just couldn't find the right mix.
As a last resort, I hit it with my favorite NIK filter - and it hit.

However, with this filter something very odd happened.  On the red roof of the house, there was a 'spot' that really didn't look natural, and unfortunately it was an eye catcher.  That spot needed to be eliminated.  Roof work can be a bit tricky to keep the look right.  I used the clone tool.  The trick is to line up the clone so the roof tile shapes stay the same.  And since there is a bit of an angle, even with the clone target directly below, the tile size didn't match exactly, but around 90%.  And if you are looking that close.......
The other interesting item is I've started sizing to 1920x1080 pixels to better fit most monitors.  For this image, that doesn't work.  There's stuff going on high, low, left and right.  I had to revert to the 5x7 format to get all the subjects in the image.
So the final image that I have, that I like, is this:

This version looks more 'real' to me.  The house has some wear, the cars on the street don't look so shiny.  And the train looks like it has been used.  A little more realistic in my view, I might see this in Johnstown, PA.

Ducks on a Fallen Tree

With the Trains and Planes taking over my recent activities, I needed to get back to nature.  And this is the shot to do it.
Although ducks are everywhere in the Refuge, it took me a few trips to'see' them.  Usually, I hear them scattering to get away from me.  They are skiddish.  But once I 'learned' to see them, they are in the most interesting places.  They can be very colorful to camouflaged. 
With much patience and a little luck, I saw this group on a fallen tree.

ISO 800, f/8, 1/400 sec, 600 mm

What really interested me about this view was the ducks appear to be 'leaning'.  In the midst of all the green, there is some blue, orange and yellow colors.
In the original photo, there were a lot of 'distractions' that required removal.  I used the content aware fill feature to remove bigger objects and clone stamping for detail work.  There were some pieces of dead wood in the water and stray leaves on the right that caught my eye that were removed.  There was also a branch on the left that crossed the left most duck that looked odd, so that had to go.
This is a fun image for me.

Reno Air Races Slideshow

I finished putting together a slideshow from some of the photos taken at the Air Races.  As all of the photos were taken on a RAW format, I had to make minor color adjustments to all.  I also went with a 1920 x 1080 pixel format.  Surprising what that crop takes out.
For the video, I also found a decent public domain sound track.  High class production!

2018 Reno Air Race Slideshow

This was interesting on fast edits to get what would otherwise be a JPG quality image.

3 T6s in a Turn

In retrospect, one of the areas of improvement for next year will be to move out of the stands.  Our seats were fantastic, except for if the airplanes were not straight an level, all I could see was underside.  The air planes were always banking away from me.  Unless there is a photo package ($$$s) available where I could get closer to some pylons on the race course, I'll have to get a be smarter on positioning for different type shots.  I'm already thinking of places to  scope out.
But until then, I have plenty of underside shots.
These are three T6s that have crossed in front of me and are heading for the first pylon.  Any clear shot with two or more air planes is good stuff.

ISO 100, f/8, 1/1000 sec, 370 mm

Aperture Priority

D7200/70-300

I changed the image format from 5x7 to 1920x1080.  Seems to fit the page nicely.

Photo Slideshow from the DMRRC Shoot

I put a slideshow together of the photos I shot at the Detroit Model Rail Road Club last week when I was out with the Flint Lensmen.
This is also an attempt at a slide show.  I tried using Lightroom, but I found that - well not so good.  not very intuitive.  I purchased a program for the West Virginia trip to put some videos together and used that program.  It worked OK.
it's short, no music.

2018 DMRRC Slideshow

These photos are just that - the raw photos.  there are a few that need some help with lights removed and maybe a new backdrop.
For the most part I was really happy with how the photo stack worked and with the 50 mm lens.

B&O and the Small Shack

Last night the photo club to which I am a member made what is turning out to be an annual trek to the Detroit Model Rail Road Club in Holly.  The club runs O scale.  This was our third year for this little adventure.  Previous posts can be seen by clicking the DMRRC link on the right.  This year, the DMRRC members really outdid themselves.  When we arrived, a number of trains were out and ready to be photographed.  The members there were more than helpful to move trains around and help set up some great scenes.  I took 28 scenes out of which around 20 are 'club' worthy.
This year I went with using a 50 mm lens.  No telephoto.  Looking back, I probably should have stuffed a 35 mm lens in my pocket for use.  I found that the 50 was a bit much for tight quarters.  During these outings, we have run of the rail road set and can get wonderful shots that the general public doesn't have access.  And some of the these areas are tighter than I thought for a 50 mm.  Lesson learned.
But the really great thing is that the images are so much sharper with the prime lenses.  I hear that all the time.
This is also my yearly dive into focus stacking.
So between the prime lens and a focus stack software upgrade my night was pretty successful, if only technically.  The aesthetic part is always open to interpretation.

ISO 100, f/6.3, 0.6 sec, 50 mm

Manual Mode, 8 shot focus stack

D7200/50 mm

In previous years, I had a number of focus mistakes by setting up too close to the subject.  This year I 'focused' on not violating the minimum distance that the lens could handle.  Much better results, but again, probably should have used the 35 mm on most shots.

(Not so) Final thoughts of the Air Races

Photographically speaking, this event was a challenge.  Stuff moves so fast.  Some of the stuff is relatively small.  Some of the stuff is relatively small and really fast.  Trying to get multiple stuff in a frame using only one eye ain't easy.  (I did try using both eyes, with my right eye in the view finder and my left eye looking for any possible trailing traffic.  Was a bit successful, but it is tiring.)
As far as equipment goes, everything worked.  The D90 and D7200 worked flawlessly.  I have attachments on each unit for an extra battery and never came close to running out of juice.  I started each day with fully changed batteries.
I shot straight RAW the entire time on both cameras.
I ran into a buffer issue once with the D90.  I was using the D90 for display photos when some action started close by and I started firing away.  It's odd when that happens as everything slows down.  For short bursts, no problems.  I never intended to use it for action sequences, so that part of the plan failed.  On the D7200, buffer was never an issue.
I did run into an interesting issue with the D7200.  The D7200 has two card slots.  I set up the second card slot for overrun.  I thought I'd have over 3k shots between both cards available.  Well, and I have to confirm this with Nikon, each card has a limit of 999 shots, regardless of size.  Apparently, I have lots of memory that can't be used.
As far as lenses go, the 18-200 and 70-300 (105-450) worked well.  I'd like to have further reach, but 450 was adequate.  (I don't like going for adequate.)  I took a few shots with the image size at 1.3 (decreased sensor size) with a reach to 600 mm but the images didn't seem to have the same quality - or I didn't handle the extra reach well.  All in all, I probably hit the shutter release 4500 times and had less than 20 out of focus images.  That's a pretty good hit rate.  I will say there were a few times a day, 3-5, where the auto focus was 'confused' by sky or clouds.
As far as framing pictures, clearly the more subjects in the frame the better.  A one airplane shot to me was usually not that interesting.  I didn't have the reach to make one airplane interesting.  When I tried to get up and tight it usually didn't work well.  When the subjects are moving that fast, unless you are perfect you need room in front and room in back.  I have more than a handful of shots, in focus, where parts of the airplane were missing.
I learned to not be afraid of daylight high ISO/high speed images.
I do plan on returning to the races next year.  I'd be OK going with same equipment, but....  I don't aim for adequate.  I'd look for bigger FF lens like Nikon's 200-500.  I'll be looking for Nikon sales.

T6 Smoke Trail

I have a lot of photos from the Reno Air Races.  Air Races, not Air Show.  Funny thing is and it is silly to say, for the most part races are races.  The colors of the aircraft change.  The aircraft positions change, but everyone is going in the same direction with very little attitude and altitude difference.  Like NASCAR, the locations where I can take pictures is somewhat limited.  To be sure, the number of aircraft in the picture can change, with more subjects I think the image is more interesting.  Airplane racing is a lot like NASCAR - only three dimensional.
Probably of no interest to the race purists would be the air show elements.  I couldn't get enough of the Heritage Flights.  I couldn't get enough of the Air Force fly-overs by the C-130s, B52 and U2.  The F16 Flight Demo was awesome.  The Patriot Jet Demo team was fantastic.
The point is, with my photos, there are a lot of race images and some will fine their way to the blog.  But the Air Show photos are much more varied.
So with that out of the way, one of the best parts of the demos was anytime the aircraft is trailing smoke.  With a photographic image, you get the instant in time.  The elusive photographic story can be told, but it is a lot easier with motion.  The smoke trail is the motion.  Viola!

ISO 100, f/6.3, 1/640 sec, 450 mm

Aperture Priority

D7200/70-300 mm

This is the far reach for my lens, I think it did just fine here.  
This is a T6, which just happened to turn 80 years old this year.  This is a World War II trainer, these days weighing in around 5,700 pounds.  The power plant is a 600 HP Pratt-Whitney radial design.  This class was my favorite to photograph.  The air frame is larger and the speeds are around 230 mph.  Faster than NASCAR, but bringing up the rear here in terms of average course speed.  The original design speed was 210 mph.
The races tend to be much closer because the modifications are very limited.  The engine size is regulated.  Much better for getting group shots.

Reno Air Races - Day Three

My trip is almost over, one day to go.
It's been a wonderful three days so far, enjoying time with friends, and making new friends.  Talking airplanes.  Talking old military tales.  Really close to paradise for me.
Photographically speaking, I've learned a lot.  There's a lot of time between races,but when the time comes it is very busy.  I've started to think faster, making adjustment quicker.  
I've become a bit more selective of shots.  I need multiple 'subjects'.  One airplane doesn't 'tell the story'.  One airplane across the start/finish line tells a story.  Two airplanes tells a story.  Three airplanes tells a better story.  Three airplane and a start/finish line tells a better story.  See where this is going?
The reality is I don't have the reach to go past the airplane level.  That is I can't drill into the cockpit, see the rivets or a loose flight control.  The equipment just isn't there.  So be the best airplane level I can be.
With this in mind, in this shot there are two air plans still in a race and being quite close. I'll have more definite information as to category and speeds later.
I chose this because the focus on the two racers is right on, the terrain in the background adds to the story and the sky is really good.

ISO 400, f/8, 1/3200 sec, 285 mm

Aperture Priority

D7200/70-300

All in all a really good day.  Looking forward to Sunday.  The weather forecast calls for excellent flying weather.  All the money is in the line.  There should be some really good racing.

Reno Air Races -Day Two (5 on 1)

Day two.  Fired off just under 1200 shots.  If I get 20 keepers, I'll really be happy.
I had issues with speed priority.  I was using it when I should not have.  And I think I missed a one time opportunity because of this.  Live and learn. Other than that, most shots came out really well.
But what I didn't miss was this.  I have some really good shots from the races, however I think my best shots for the day were taken during the Patriots Jet team show.
The Patriot jet show is akin to the Navy Blue Angles and Air Force Thunderbird shows.
For the shots of where there were to be crossing maneuvers, I'd follow one of the aircraft and just start shooting from where I thought they'd be close until I thought the jets had passed. Logically this should work.  Timing is everything, with a little luck set in.  I have the camera set up to shoot at 5 frames per second.  I tried to minimize the focus actuations, hopefully saving time so I could hit that 5 FPS rate.  I have a few good shot with this practice, I'm sure more images will find their way here. 
This is a time when five jets raced toward one jet.  And I think I nailed it.
The day had been sunny up to this point and we started to lose light as this show started.  I chose to hit this with some Photomatixto add some harshness.  For this and the of my other shots a plain photo won't do.  (There are more cameras here than I can count.)
Here are 5 jets going against one.

ISO 400, f/8, 1/3200 sec, 225 mm

Aperture Priority

D7200/70-300

Other than a little color magic, this image is not retouched in any way.  The aircraft are where they are.  I have the original file.  
This was an incredibly awesome show.

Reno Air Races - Day One

What a fantastic time today.  While watching the races and shows were fun, I met so many new friends.  Talking aircraft and related subjects was so much fun.  And although I'm not a pilot, my AF experience gave me instant cred.
Our seats are beyond fantastic.  Top row of the stands, right on the start/finish line.
Photographically speaking, 1700+ shots with both the D90 and D7200.  Call it newbie jitters.  Tomorrow I'll be more restrained.  Maybe.
At max length of 450 and the stretch 600 - that really wasn't enough for what I'd like to do.  That being said,  I have a lot of shots that are much better than I thought they'd turn out.
I'll have to get a race program for the year, just because I'm not that familiar with the classes.  I'll have to add the camera and lens to the information of each photo.
I believe this is the T-6 class.  

ISO 200, f/18, 1/160, 170 mm

Shutter priority

D90/18-200

I was shooting this sequence with speed priority to try to catch the movement of the propellers.
While I could get a number of shots with single aircraft, the most interesting to me are where I could catch multiple aircraft.
And this is only day one - the day to shake loose what configurations to use.  Three days to go.  Awesome.

Wood Duck - Full Color

This Wood Duck is like Bigfoot to me.  I've heard about them.  I've seen pictures of them.  But when you see one - and can prove it the myth disappears.  How does nature do this?  I don't know what the colors mean, maybe in time I'll find out.  I have a new color test pattern.
There is an issue that is creeping up on me, which has been mentioned before.  This image is at 600 mm.  The end of my reach.  It is cropped.  Simply this is the best I can do.  I fear another purchase.  Relatively soon.

ISO 800, f/8, 1/400 sec, 600 mm

Capturing a duck photo, for me, wasn't easy.  Ducks appear to be the most skiddish of all the creatures in the Refuge.  Just thinking about raising the camera and they'll scatter.  For this photo I had to stop the truck, kill the engine and wait for about 10 minutes for this one to appear.  Well worth the wait.  I waited by an area where I could see the ducks moving behind a log, but not on the water bank.  Eventually, this one just jumped put of the water on to the log and, just surveyed the area.  This one one didn't move for about five minutes, so I could take quite a few shots.
I need more reach.