Flint Rogues Rugby Football Team - Team Photo

Since everything starts with the goals of the next airshow, follow me here and I will get to the Rugby team in short order.

Every year I think of what I want to accomplish in the next year's airshow season.  Last year - it was the use of Auto ISO and is it a benefit?  And every year is the battle to get better with prop blur.  In order to determine the goals, I search out airshow and general aircraft photos on line, and see what works for me.  Kills time on rainy days.  This year, I started looking at Moose Peterson's aviation photography.  Moose is primarily a nature photographer, with a fondness for the aviation subject.  He's very good at both.  And since he is a Nikon dude, I don't have to put his tips and tricks through some form of Rosetta Stone.

While looking at the technical aspects of his photography, one of his lines of non-technical advice is 'just show up'.  That gets to me - just do something.  Preferably interesting.

To the Rugby.  Just show up.  Post a few pictures.  Get a bit of an audience.  And it all works.  On Flickr, the Rugby album is the most active.  And popular enough that the team asked me to take their team photo - the 50th year team photo.  I expect they will use where appropriate.

This is my first project with a staged team situation.  I looked up a number of team photos.  I like shots close enough to see and count the rivets.  That doesn't happen here.  I'm used to using long lenses - again not here where a nifty fifty will do.  And the new D6?  In the bag as this is a situation for the D850.  Oh yea, and that pesky tripod thingie.

And if that wasn't enough pressure, the photo was date and time sensitive.  The date worked out as the fall storm clouds cleared.  The time not so much.  The time was less than an hour to sunset.  Oh, those client wishes/demands.  And the setting?  North goal post.  Can you spell harsh light?

I'd like the shots to be a bit lighter, but light is really tough to work at that point.  So it is what it is, maybe newer software will help at a later date.

Both shots were with the D850 and a NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G lens.

And just the Lads:

You never know what will happen when 'you just show up'.

Davison High School Football '22

Since the last high school football adventure, there have been a few new developments and processes.

As to the developments, there is a new camera in the stable. For the football games, at night, the D500 and D850 did real well.  I some time forget that that this is a hobby.  The D500 was not built for 'under the lights' photography.  That point is probably mentioned in the documentation.  But it has a virtually unlimited buffer.  I have never filled the buffer, even at 10 FPS shooting RAW.  Technically the documentation says it will hold 200 shots.  I never tested that.  But the D500 with the crop sensor does much better in daylight.  The D850 with the full frame sensor did very well at night, but it is built for portraits and landscapes.  The 48 mp files fill up the buffer quickly.  Yep, I lost a few shots.

Enter the D6.  Built for sports, or action shooting.  The 20 mp layout on a full frame sensor means the pixels are almost as big as a beach ball.  Lets in a lot of light - and reduces the noise.  What's not to like?  

First, it is a bit pricey.  I can deal with that.  I looked at a used unit from KEH.  I used KEH for a lens and was very happy with the transaction.  That being said, a lens is not as complicated as a camera unit.  And for a few $$$$s more, I could get a re-furbished unit from Nikon.  And I get all the accessories, including the most outrageously priced Nikon sells, the battery charger.  Easy decision.

The other minor decision is, why stay with DSLR and not move to a mirrorless system?  Everyone has their opinion, here's mine that applies to me only.  I have too much sunk into the system I have.  If I was 10 years younger, I might change.  My opinion is that adding an adapter between the lens and the camera (FTZ) won't help anything.  And if I was going to move on to a mirrorless system, it would not be with Nikon.  (Or Canon!) So a D6 it is.

I used the D6 for the rugby shots here.  It did not disappoint in the daylight, nor did I expect it to.  But it is here for night shots.

One other development in the past few weeks comes from the software world, and that is the introduction of Topaz's Photo AI.  In summary, it uses AI for denoise and sharpen.  In practice, I have found it useful for shots that need very little cleanup.  So in the cases of the rugby and football shots, this application works well and has sped up the post processing.  Not sure how it will go with the aircraft.  So far, for past shots - not as well.  The time will come later for real testing.

But for now, some football shots with the D6 and quick post processing.

Not sure how many more games there are this season, playoffs begin soon.  Hopefully this team has a few more games to go.

Flint Rugby

I found out recently that Flint has a rugby team.  Turns out someone in the subdivision is related to the team, and had a sign in their front yard.  A few quick searches and I found out all the pertinent information.  The game yesterday was preceded by the the delivery of the D6 - perfect timing.

Now I know nothing about rugby.  So the night before the match I was cruising YouTube to see what the game was all about.  After watching a few game highlights video, I drifted to the most egregious red card activities.  Don't judge me.

For more photos of this outing: Flickr Album

Next match locally be in a few weeks.  May have to get a heavier jacket by then.

Why I shoot RAW - Again

Why I shoot RAW  - Again.

First, the disclaimers.

I generally set up my camera for the day to create both RAW and JPG images.  My reasoning is with JPGs, through the Snapbridge App I can download a file to my phone.  I can save it for later or share it.  That is the only reason.  I have the JPG setting for in camera processing to Vivid or Landscape.  That's it.  Nothing special after that.  I'm sure if I was living in JPG land, I could tweak the settings a bit more.  But I don't live in JPG land.

Truth is, most of the JPGs come out pretty well.  Nikon, as one would expect, does a nice job.  Especially if you give it something to work with.

But sometimes in more difficult environments - not so much.  And the reality is I'm not into quantity.  If I shoot 1,200 shots at an air show, I'm looking for the 10-20 best shots.  Most outings, I'm looking for 5 to 10 good shots.

And working with RAW files fits that mold.

The past two weekends, I've been enjoying Friday Night Lights football at the local high school.  And enjoyed every minute of it.  Last weekend, the sky was lightly overcast providing a lot of good light.  Last night was clear and a million.  (Very clear)  Harsh shadows.  The stadium is basically north-south.  With the stands on the west side.  When the sun is setting, the shadow comes across the field toward the aluminum seats.  Perfect setting for HDR - except for that tricky action-motion thing.

This is the story:  120 mm, 1/1,000 sec, f/5, ISO 360.

Metering is center weighted.  I use Auto ISO, so metering is taken into account.

The original RAW image:

Those stands are bright.  Let's see what the Nikon in camera processing does.

If there is improvement, I don't see it.

The original histogram:

Lot's of darks, but I'm guessing the camera won't adjust anything because of the lights blocking much movement.  JPGs are not designed to be manipulated.  You can, but with each subsequent save, there is data lost.  RAW files are designed to be manipulated.

The trick, for me anyway, is to manipulate the curves.  For aircraft photos, this is the tool for filling in shadows.  In the case of this shot - need more than filling in.  But this is what the curves will do.

Nix the highlights.  Pump the Darks.

The adjusted histogram:

I still have the highlights on the right, but I've evened out the darks.  You could make an argument that I could lighten the darks even more, which is true.  But I'm claiming artistic license here.  It's still in the shadows.  And I want to show the difference.

The adjusted shot:

Much improved.  For me anyway.  Doesn't look photoshopped.

Could you make such a drastic change with a JPG.  Maybe.  I would want to stake a one time only shot on it.  Again, RAW files are designed and meant to be manipulated.

And that is why I continue to shoot and 'develop' RAW files.  I can depend on the shot.  Unless I miss it.  Ha.

Success Story

It is a small step, but I will take it.  

I have a few success stories, in that someone will ask if a photo of mine is for sale of if they can use it.  Note to people going forward to ask - for personal use only.  Anyway, the biggest success story was a local author wanting to use a photo for one of his book covers.
Belle Isle Fishing Pier

The next batch of successes comes from the UHH (Ugly Hedgehog) photography forum.  Like most forums, if there are comments they are nice and politically correct.  But if members take the time to leave a comment, or even a smiley, that is a feel good moment.  On one photograph, the user said they were going to put it on their coffee mug.  No offense taken.

As to publishing on the web, and the threat of theft, it is a double edged dilemma.  I want to get my name out there - but not as an easy mark.  I risk it.  Investment to the journey.

A few days ago, another UHHer asked if they could use one of my photos for personal use.  If someone takes the time to ask, they are respectful of the process.  Whatever I can do to help - I'm at their disposal.  The photo they were interested in:  

Heritage Flight - P-51 and F-16

OK - I'll say it - that is a darn fine shot.  Prop blur - no mistake.  And no sun spots on the canopies.  And just enough blue sky to make it interesting.

But that fact someone else likes it enough to reach out takes the ego to another level.  And makes it all worthwhile.

And when someone shares what their vision was - just friggin' awesome.

For clarity - this is not my photo and this is not my photo of the cat.  (Which looks to be a great photo as well.)

Happy to be on someone's wall.

It's going to be a good day.

Friday Night Lights

And now for something completely different.....

Every now and then I get to start a new category.  Today is one of those days.  Not sure if it will stick, but the 2022 Airshow season for me is pretty much over.  Need to do something - and this is what we call in the corporate world a 'stretch'.

A few weeks ago, I was out to a lacrosse tournament.  Haven't seen a game in years.  It was a lot of fun.  Lot's of good action.  And in the middle of the day - warm.  I never figure these things out for myself - I get invited.  Or in this case - dared.  And good for photography friends who pull me out of a rut.

And the same 'friend' dared me again to stretch, this time with Friday night lights.  As with most of my photography friends, he's a Canon guy.  I think he really wants to see if I could handle a Nikon outside of perfect airshow conditions.

And good for him, I wanted to see what the Nikon would do as well.  And can I handle the Friday Night Lights.

As with most times I try something new, if you shoot enough shots, something is bound to work right.  And Friday night I shot 350+ shots.  And a few turned out OK.  A few.

I use the D850/70-200 f/2.8 for the evening.  It did OK.  The shots that didn't require much cropping were pretty much good right out of the camera.  I shot manual with Auto ISO, and the highest was 11,400.  And for the most point, the shots were usable.  That being said, I hit the shot buffer a few times at 7 fps.  That was a first.  Yes, shots were missed.  I dialed it back to 5 fps which somewhat cured the issue.  Lessons learned.

DHS Stands

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20 /Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8

70 mm, 1/1,000 sec, f/4.5, ISO 800 (Auto)

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

To me this is one of the more interesting shots of the night.  Pure football.  Should have been higher than 1/500 sec.  lesson learned.

DHS Running Back

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20 /Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8

200 mm, 1/500 sec, f/4.5, ISO 900 (Auto)

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

For the most part, I focused on the QB.  Most of the action is there, right?  Rookie stuff.  Coming from the defensive side.  I like the shots where you can also see the ball in flight.

DHS Pass

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20 /Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8

200 mm, 1/500 sec, f/4.5, ISO 1000 (Auto)

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

The opposition runner.  He is pretty good.

Detroit Central Catholic Runner

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20 /Nikkor 70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8

135 mm, 1/500 sec, f/4.5, ISO 800 (Auto)

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

Will post a few more shots later.

But for end of the experience thoughts.  I chose the D850 for the full sensor and low light exceptional ISO traits.  But it is advertised as a portrait camera - and fast action is limited.  That is truth in advertising.  Next time, the D500 gets a try.  If I do that, I'll have to put the 70-400 on the front end.  There won't be as much room to crop.  It will be more than enough lens.  The noise could be more prevalent.  The best shots for focus were 1/800 to 1/1000 second.  I could use the 1/500 shots - but I wouldn't want to count on them.  And after all, this is a learning experience.

ToM '22 Heritage Flight - P51 and F-16

One of my favorite events of any airshow is the Heritage Flight.  The Heritage Flight is a combination effort between an older era aircraft and a current generation aircraft.

In this case, the combination flight was the P-51D Mustang Bald Eagle and the F-16 from the Viper Demo Team.  Great colors.

As with any shot of a prop driven aircraft, slower shots are always a crap shoot and to get a few useable shots is a bonus.

This Viper Demo Team and I have crossed paths earlier this year at JB Charleston.  The post is here.  Odd fact, the most visited post of the year at 237.  That photo is one of my favorites for sure.  And one of these will be in that class as well.  That paint job is incredible.  And the Bald Eagle's paint job is pretty cool as well.

Heritage Flight P-51 and F-16 High Pass

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

435 mm, 1/200th sec, f/13, ISO 100

EV +0.33, Shutter Priority, Size DX

This one is going to be a favorite - fits on the monitor really well.  If I could get some snow on it, it would be in the running for this year's Christmas Card.

Heritage Flight P-51 and F-16 Show Pass

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

315 mm, 1/200th sec, f/16, ISO 100

EV +0.33, Shutter Priority, Size DX

WWII Air Pair - Kittyhawk and Hurricane

Nothing like a little pressure to get a good shot.  Pressure in that I never like to say once in a lifetime, I may see this pair again.  But probably not.  And pressure to get a prop driven aircraft.  It's not like an early jet flying where you can dial up the speed and almost ensure a crisp shot.  Shooting moving objects at 1/200th second or slower decreases the chance for a decent shot.  Pressure.

I'm settling in on a shutter speed of 1/200th of a second for my best chance of a WWII fighter class shot with acceptable prop blur.

The Thunder over Michigan '22 show featured some WWII fighter aircraft from the European theater.  And some others.

In the end, it doesn't matter to me as I'm happy to see whoever shows up and starts up those engines.

In this case, two Allied fighters take to the skis again.  A P-40 Kittyhawk and a Hawker Hurricane.  To me, a non-English major, this is poetry.  To me, the non-Art major, this is Art.

Kittyhawk and Hurricane Level Flight

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

420 mm, 1/200 sec, f/7.1, ISO 100

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

And this shot is quickly becoming a favorite as a screen background.

Kittyhawk and Hurricane Right Bank

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

420 mm, 1/200 sec, f/7.1, ISO 100

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

Good shots.

Super Saber F100-F Two Weekends in a Row

Last month had two airshows for me.  Both close to home.  One was a one day event, for me, and the other was a long weekend.  From what I can tell, there was only one aircraft that made both shows.  The Selfridge ANGB and Thunder over Michigan are not small shows.  I thought there would have been more crossover between the two shows within a few miles of each other.

The aircraft that made both shows was a North American Aviation F-100 Super Saber.

The Super Saber was designed/developed in the 50's, which makes it older than me.

The Super Saber was the first operational jet aircraft to exceed the speed of sound in level flight.  (Operational, not test.)  It was also the first jet fighter to cross the North Pole in 1959.  It was the first jet to enter the Viet Nam war.  The Super Saber has a place in history.

The aircraft is powered by a P&W J-57, which is where we cross paths.  This J-57 has an afterburner for extra thrust.  The J-57 I worked on used water to increase thrust on take-off.  But a J-57 is still a J-57.  It's all in the guts.

Photographically this is a tough bird to catch.  Polished scored aluminum.  On a sunny day, there is probably a hot spot somewhere.  Somehow I survived.  The first shot is from the Selfridge Open House, where the sky helped the shot a lot.  

F-100F in the air.

F-100F Inflight

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

247 mm, 1/1250 sec, f/6.3, ISO 100

EV 0, Shutter Priority, Size DX

Another F-100F inflight shot, but this time there are two aircrew at the ToM show.  Fortunately there was heavy overcast which cut down on the sun hotspots.  The blue sky is due to heavy post processing and a RAW file format.  If I ever do another post on why I shoot RAW, this would be a test photo.

F-100F Straight and Level

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

495 mm, 1/1250 sec, f/5.6, ISO 100

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size DX

I like takeoff shots, especially if there is something unique to capture.  Not that an afterburner shot is unique, but an older AB shot is interesting.  

F-100F AB Take Off

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

540 mm, 1/1250 sec, f/5.6, ISO 800

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

I thought this last shot was a bit different.  Two in the cockpit.  For most taxi shots, there is only one.

F-100F Taxi with Two

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/70.0-200.0 mm f/2.8

135 mm, 1/640 sec, f/5.0, ISO 64

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

Neat aircraft to watch and listen to.  It is interesting to hear the differences between one of the early jet engines of the F-100 and the current generation of engines in modern aircraft.

Meeting the Enemy - VFC-12 Super Hornets

Airshows start with two types of aircraft displays, aerial and static.  There are lots of reasons aircraft will only be on static display.  Any reason from old age to cost to fly.

For the Thunder over Michigan show, I saw that there were two F-18s from the VFC-12 squadron.  Time for internet research.

VFC-12 is an Adversary squadron.  The Navy's version of an Aggressor Squadron.  Or visa-versa.  Both do the same, fly American jets performing enemy tactics.

And to play the enemy, you have to look like the enemy.  Or what you think the enemy looks like.

The current VFC-12 paint scheme on the Super Hornets is based on the Su-35 Flanker Prototype 2 Arctic Splinter Camouflage.

One of the nice things about the ToM show is that on Friday the photographers can move around the ramp without many people around and the stanchion posts and ropes.  Less distractions to remove from the photographs.

F18 Adversary Reflection on the Ramp

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8

31 mm, 1/125 sec, f/5, ISO 560

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

F18 Adversary on the Ramp

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8

24 mm, 1/125 sec, f/5, ISO 640

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

I get the static showing only for these aircraft.  No sense showing what they know.  But thanks for showing up.  Awesome static photos.

Curtiss Wright P-40M

This was my second year at the Thunder over Michigan airshow, but third year of trying.  It was that damn Covid thingie.  I made it last year, and this year.  From what I can tell, they try to have some sort of theme every year.  Last year, it was the gathering of B-25s.  This year, it was WWII fighters.  The American fighters, British fighters and German fighters were represented.  Better yet, they were flying.  And making noise.

This particular aircraft is owned by the Tri-State Warbird Museum in Ohio.  It was built in 1943.

The P-40 Warhawk was exported to a number of Allied countries.  The P-40M signified an Allison engine instead of a Packard Merlin engine.  This particular aircraft paint scheme looks to be a Royal New Zeeland Air Force.  (Just a guess)  And as such, would not be a Warhawk, but a Kittyhawk III.  And that is how it was advertised on the show aircraft list.  It all comes together.

This was one of the aircraft in the Night Shoot.

I really did like the paint on this aircraft.  Very different from what I've seen before.  There is a P-40 that races in Reno that is a traditional olive green.  The extent of my exposure to P-40s.

So for the show, this was a fun aircraft to watch fly.  And to listen to.

P-40 Kittyhawk III Close Taxi

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8

135 mm, 1/60th sec, f/9, ISO 64

EV 0, Shutter Priority, Size FX

I like this take off shot a lot for a few reasons. First, the prop tip contrails are just plain cool.   I've seen these before in other photos, now I have mine.  The other thing was, I made a mistake.  I usually shoot military props at 1/200 second.  For some reason, I was shooting at 1/1000 second.  In this case, it worked.  Aircraft relatively sharp.  And the props are not frozen, just a degree away.  For the take off, that seems to be OK - but for the prop tip contrails - it is a must.

P-40 Kittyhawk III Take Off

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31 /NIKKOR 80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

600 mm, 1/1000th sec, f/5.6, ISO 640

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

This inflight shot really illustrates the aircraft markings.  It also looks like I'm beginning to favor the bank shot where the cockpit and pilot open up more.  Also, the sky was so bad in this shot just a total white.  I'm happy with cooling WB of the sky as opposed to replacing the sky.  Turned out OK, and yes that is something else learned.

P-40 Kittyhawk III Show Pass

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31 /NIKKOR 80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

315 mm, 1/200th sec, f/7.1, ISO 100

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

Again, in this shot the sky is so bad, but there is a smidgen of definition.  And a cool pilot silhouette.

P-40 Kittyhawk III Decent

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31 /NIKKOR 80.0-400.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

420 mm, 1/200th sec, f/9, ISO 100

EV +1, Shutter Priority, Size DX

Whenever I see these old warbirds in the air, I can picture and hear hundreds in the sky.  Aside from that pesky war thing, what a time in aviation.

ToM 22 - The Night Shoot

If there was a silver lining to the very overcast weather for the airshow, it is that all my body energy was not sucked out of me by the sun.  For the ToM 21 show, that Saturday was very hot.  As such, I didn't make it to the night shoot.  This year I was more prepared, drank a lot more water and was more mentally prepared for a long day.

Yep, kicking myself for not going last year.  Self backslap for making the effort this year.

The night shoot is just that, photographing aircraft at night.  With a little help from some strategically placed lights.  And where appropriate, the props turning.  Recipe for an awesome photograph.

For most of Saturday afternoon, I was pestering other photographers about what settings to use.  I am the consummate fair weather photographer, the previous Wet Wednesday show not withstanding.  But the nighttime environment is new to me.  What to use?  What to set?  Will I embarrass myself?

The equipment question was easy.  I made sure the tripod was packed for the show.  As for the camera, the D850 with a full frame was the easy choice - as opposed to the D500 and the crop frame.  Full frame in less light.  The mechanical performance advantage of the D500 was not necessary.  As for the lens, either of the f/2.8 lenses would be used.  I guessed, and it was a guess, that I would need 50 mm for the event.  I chose the 24-70.  I was using it for the walk around earlier in the day and I had the distance calculated in my head.  I was fairly confident.  Ha.

Now, what settings?  I asked around a lot - shutter speeds of anywhere from 3 to 15 seconds.  Yikes.  OK, I didn't ask about equipment used, but I can account for most of the discrepancies.  What about releasing the shutter?  I was going to use a wireless - but I saw may others doing the same.  What about a cross frequency un-commanded release?

But where to start?

I started when the sun started to set.

We arrived to the location when the sun was just behind the trees.  Time to practice.

First, I set a shutter delay of 1 second.  With an expected shutter speed of over 3 seconds, would a delay of any time really matter?

By pure accident, I found a solution to all my settings questions.  First, the ISO was 64 - the D850 base.  No question there.  Then, because I was using a tripod and getting the to eye viewer wasn't that easy, I activated the camera's Live View on the rear screen.  What luck!  I had it set up to show the shutter speed and aperture settings.  Just in time to be of use.  Using this, I could dial in just a bit of underexposure to get the look I was going for.  For me, this was the eureka moment.  It helps to know your camera - or at least fake it.

The three aircraft, F-16, Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Curtiss P-40.  Yep, no prop on the F-16 but it did turn out better than I thought.  Rumor had it that this was the first current military aircraft ever done with a night shoot.  I'm trying to confirm.

All shots are with the D850 and 24.0-70.0 mm f/2.8 lens.  All are EV 0, MANUAL Mode and size FX.

The F-16 was first.

The first test shot.  Great sky colors.  The spot lights are just starting to come in.

F-16 Night Shoot - Test

50 mm, 0.6 sec, f/4.5, ISO 64

Shortly after this, the firetruck showed up to put down the reflective layer of water.  Picky photographers, eh?  The spraying of the water with the longer exposure time had an interesting effect.  

F-16 Night Shoot with Firetruck

50 mm, 1.6 sec, f/4.5, ISO 64

For the final F-16 shot, it wasn't completely dark.  Michigan in July.  Days are long.  The crowd was getting restless.  Still, it worked.

F-16 Night Shoot ToM '22

50 mm, 4.0 sec, f/4.0, ISO 64

Very cool.

Next aircraft in was a Messerschmitt Bf 109.  My only criticism of the event was the selection of this aircraft.  No paint on the props.  I'm sure it isn't easy to get 'volunteers' to stay late for a bunch of photos.  That being said, the shots were still OK.

Messerschmitt Bf 109 Night Shoot ToM '22

44 mm, 4.0 sec, f/5.6, ISO 64

Tough to see the props.

The last aircraft was a Curtiss P-40.  This was a show personal favorite.  The paint scheme was from the RNZAF.  Very cool.  And the prop was just right.

Curtiss P-40 Night Shoot ToM '22

40 mm, 3.5 sec, f/4.0, ISO 64

Because I was a rookie at this, I took a position and held.  There was time to move around to get a different angle.  That being said, there were about 70 photographers there and moving wasn't that easy.  But time to think about that for next year.

Corsair Aircraft - and what I learned

For someone with a declared hobby of WWII aircraft, I don't know a lot.  And for someone who proclaimed that their favorite aircraft included anything with F-4 in the name, I have lots of room to learn.

Not sure why I gravitated to the F-4 Corsair for a personal interest.  Was it the unique gull wing?  Was it a 70's TV show?  Who knows, but the attraction is there.

I am fortunate to see them fly before the last one is grounded.  And the noise, don't get me started.

And as I found out this past weekend, I might have a high school degree in the subject of the Corsair - but far from a BS.  (Ha...)  

When I see an interesting (to me) aircraft at an air show, I like to do a bit of research on the actual aircraft.  If it is on the web, the information must be correct, eh?  But you can believe at least 80% of the internet search.  And that is what happened in my last search of aircraft N43FG.

Aircraft N43FG looks like a F4 Corsair.  And I would have lost the identity bet.  Aircraft N43FG is a FG-1D Corsair.  WTH?

A quick search of Wikipedia helped clear the confusion.  I listened to the Book Arsenal of Democracy a few months ago.  Although there are many subject lines discussed, the aircraft subject got me the most.  Many aircraft were built by many manufacturers under licensing agreements.  And in the case of aircraft N43FG, FG-1D is the designation of a Corsair licensed built by the Goodyear Company between 1943 and 1945 (EOW).  There were just over 4,000 built by Goodyear company.  In very round numbers, this was about 1/3 of the total built for the war effort.

There is the rest of the story.

But the eye test tells me this is a Corsair, and it could have been on the TV show.  Only the data plate will tell.

At Thunder over Michigan this year, the Corsair put on a very nice show.

It is nice to be able to get on the ramp when the people traffic is slow.

FG-1D Corsair on the Ramp

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8

38 mm, 1/320 sec, f/6.3, ISO 64

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

As the show went along, I dropped my shutter speed for taxi shots from 1/200 to 1/60.

FG-1D Corsair Close Taxi

NIKON D850 Ver.1.20/NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8

170 mm, 1/160 sec, f/11, ISO 64

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size FX

This shot was taken early Friday afternoon, when the sky was somewhat passable.  Not sure how this happened, but it turned out pretty good.

FG-1D Corsair Left Bank

NIKON D500 Ver.1.31/NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

292 mm, 1/200 sec, f/11, ISO 100

EV 0, MANUAL Mode, Size DX

Every day is good when you learn something new.