Eagle Approach to Nest

Today's biggest decision for after work was to go for exercise walk or go Eagle watching.  Too nice a day to worry about health.
Turns out it was a good decision to ditch the walk.  I went out to my favorite Eagle paparazzi spot thinking that the excellent temperature and clear skies would have the Eagles moving around.  Not that I know a lot about Eagle habits, but the warm weather had me out and about.
Once I arrived at the park, I could tell this was the right thing to do.  It was as (critter) noisy as I'd heard it so far this year.  Bug, geese and other birds were all in symphony.
Compared to other visits, I was there just over an hour when I saw the unmistakable shape of an Eagle on approach against a cloudless blue sky.  It flew toward me, did a circle over my viewing area and a circle approach to the nest.
Two technical points about today, I wanted to do a lot of shots with the 1.3x frame size.  This would effectively extend my max viewing angle to that of a 600 mm lens.  I really need to know how much I can crop the image if necessary before it becomes unusable.  And I wanted to slay the other monster that attacks my wildlife images, the photo bombing trees that steal the auto focus.
I took just over 140 Eagle shots this afternoon.  I had only three shots that the focus was really, really bad.  I had another three where the trees stole the focus.  With the rest, the auto focus held on the moving subject through the branches.  Just like the Engineers drew it up.  For me, excellent results.
What I witnessed this afternoon was shift change at the nest.  Wow.  I was hoping the approaching Eagle would have some form of food for its mate.  Alas, there was nothing but empty talon.  When I saw the other mate leaving the nest, I figured out what was going on.
I still don't know if there are Eaglets in the nest.  In the past I've seen food flown in.  This was different.  This was two parents hunting.  The population in the nest may be more than two.
So, it was a great day to Eagle watch.  For the most part, I didn't screw anything up.  I have some great images with both DX and 1.3x frame sizes.  Even with a pretty good crop, this turned out well.

I was shooting at 3 FPS.  Part of me says I should have gone at a higher rate, but instead of throwing away over 100 shots, there would be more.  There is a sequence where I would have really like to had a higher rate, but we'll see what I can pull out of that one.  Today, definitely one of the better efforts.  And a lot of luck.

Penn Central 8620 (DMRRC)

This researching of train is fascinating.  And I'm now beginning to believe it was the train aficionados that created the internet as a device to store and share their information.  The amount of information that is available is somewhat overwhelming.  And so it is with the Penn Central 8620.  And in the small world happenings of life, it turns out that the PC 8620 and I have a connection.
The original PC 8620, a SW8, was built in February of 1953 by General Motors Diesel.  (Being built in February of the 1950s is close to a connection, but that isn't it.)  The unit was one of just over a total 370 built.  The 8620 one of was originally built for the New York Central Rail Road.  In 1968, the NYCRR merged with the Pennsylvania Railroad to form the short lived Penn Central.  The Penn Central went bankrupt in 1970 and later merged with Conrail. 
The SW8 was a diesel electric built for standard gauge with a 8 cylinder two stroke supercharged diesel engine rated at 800 hp that generated 600 kW of power.  The model was built between 1950 and 1954.  Some of the units were built for the US ARMY and found their way to South Korea.  One unit was owned by the US AIR FORCE for the Titan Missile Program.
 Anyway, going bankrupt in 70's is not our connection either.
What does connect us is that I found a number of pictures of the PC 8620, now the Conrail 8620, in downtown Pittsburgh in December of 1977.  I'm sure that sometime in December of 1977, I was dahn-tahn as well.  Small world.

This model has fared much better than the shots I found on line.

Eagle in the Nest

Yesterday I felt like the Eagle paparazzi.  I staked out my new favorite nest for over two hours waiting for some good Eagle action.  What a life!
I thought the only good action would be a fly-in.  How wrong could one be?
First, I found a great spotting location.  Didn't have to bang through a lot of underbrush.  Had a nice level spot with clear vision to the nest.  I'm guessing the distance was about 70 yards.  (Could be a new toy alert, range finder?)  Big enough for a chair.
I never saw a fly-in, but at some point I saw some movement int he nest.  Picked up the camera and fired away.  Haven't any clue if to the Eaglets have hatched yet, but guessing that is a few weeks away.  Thinking this was the female moving around.

This is pretty much the limit of my equipment.  This was effectively 450 mm shot.  And it is aggressively cropped.  But it looks good on the monitors.

BNSF 5681 (DMRRC)

Planes, Trains and Automobiles.  I'd like to find a way to lump Great Lakes Freighters in there as well.  All are large.  All are very powerful.  All are mechanical.  I often wonder if the information outlets that exist today existed in my 'learning' years where my life might have taken me.  I'm fortunate to have had an exposure to automobiles and planes early in life.  I have thoroughly enjoyed my experiences in the large aircraft world.  Could I have done the same on the water or the rails?
Enough musing on a Sunday afternoon.  But it does lead me to do more research on some of the photography subjects.  I tried to find information on the Union Pacific Engine 489, but was not successful.  I was able to find out more about the BNSF 5681.  And yes, there is one in existence working the lines as of March 2018.  
The working BNSF 5681 is a GE AC44CW, built in March of 2004.  The AC44CW model was built between 1993 and 2004.  There were over 2800 engines produced, with 121 going to BNSF.
The 4,400 HP engine was built for standard gauge track.  It weighs in over 425,000 pounds carrying 5,000 gallons of fuel.  It is 73 feet long and 15.5 feet high.
And this one has orange and yellow paint.  Can't be all bad.

At ISO 2000, there was some noise that had to be removed.  Now that I'm getting the hang of it, just have to remember to do this.
With the lights on, I had to go with a -1.0 EV.
At the DMRRC, this was just sitting without much going on around it.

Union Pacific 489 - We Can Handle It

One of my favorite locations for a back drop at the DMRRC is a bit hard to get to.  Setup for these shots is from an access point in the middle of the set.  That's the easy part.  Getting to the access point is not the easy point.  There are low points to crawl around.  Once you can get there, the effort is worth it.
I was lucky enough to get an interesting set of engines in front of the station house.  I wasn't stacking at this point, going with single shot.  To get a clear shot, I was going with 1/80 second on a 35 mm lens.  I could have gone slower, maybe down to 1/50 second, but I needed to be sure.  I wanted to get some DOF, with speed considerations I went with f/6.3.  That put the ISO up around 5k.

Getting a focus point is critical.  With critters and humans, go for the eyes.  For me, with the trains, it is the train number placard above the cab windows.  if I can get the focus on that, the rest will take care of itself.  It's even tougher if the placard is backlit, which is not the case here.  Usually with the model trains, if the numbers are lit, the train has a chance of moving.  Usually.  Anyway, getting the placard sharp is critical.
Here's the focus point:

I did get it where it needed to be.  Good start.
The original image needs a lot of help.  As I mentioned before, I was taking this from an access point and hand holding the camera.  It's not exactly level.  I was just happy there wasn't any evidence of camera shake.

The weathering on these units is really good.  Engines look used.  Realism.
This looks good on the monitor as a screen saver.  

Eagle Chasing, Close to Home

No day is bad when the skies are clear and the temps are approaching 60 at the end of March.  It's a Friday and the work week is over.  I'm going Eagle chasing, close to home.
I've been living here over 20 years, and I'm just getting out.
I staked out the nest for close to two hours this afternoon.  I could see some movement in the nest.  I have this shot from earlier in the week, when the food was delivered via air.

Photographically speaking, there isn't much going on here.  But, just to be here to see this is awesome.  I had seen the fly in Eagle come in, no images and probably just as well.  Just to see it come in.
And today's effort was to see the fly in Eagle deliver the food.  This was as close as I could get.

Damn tree held the auto focus......  I can laugh about it now.  But again, I watched the drama unfold with both eyes and it is something I won't forget for some time.
In the end, I was in the woods for about 2.5 hours.  Time well spent.
Probably the best image of the afternoon was a Canadian Goose.  There were a few of them 'sunning' themselves on a body of water.  I was surprised I could get close to them, but I did and watched for a while.

So far this year, I've been shooting Manual with Auto ISO on.  I like it.
So here is my Canadian Goose shot for the day.

I like the sun angle, just before sunset.  usually doesn't work that way for me.  I'll take it.

Penn Central 6816 - Weathered

This year at the DMRRC model train shoot, there were two trains that I had not seen previously.  One was a US ARMY painted locomotive with cargo cars loaded with Army tanks.
The other engine was 'weathered'.  Weathering model trains is the same as weathering other models, that is the process to make a model a bit more realistic.  A lot of the trains at the DMRRC have various degrees of weathering.  For some reason, the job on the PC 6816 really got to me.  Maybe, because if I were to draw a working train, this would be it.
I had taken this image after I put away all the stacking stuff, meaning this is a single shot.  There's a bit o' bokeh in the background but I can live with it.
The other item of note, I was using manual mode with auto ISO.  In my case, it is live and learn.
The settings:

Look at that ISO - 11,400.  Yikes.
What does an image at ISO 11 - whatever look like at 100%?

Since I very rarely shoot anything over ISO 2000, my experience with removing noise is somewhat limited.  Always a chance to learn.
All of my noise decreasing programs/filters didn't help much with this image.  Most just sharpened the noise, which I think is funny.  I ended up using ACR's noise reduction sliders.  Again, a learning thing.
When I finished that process, I hit it with AI Clear.  Not so much for the noise reduction, but to add just a bit of sharpening back.
And that gave me this:

The noise irritation is gone, and some definition still remains.  I like this a lot.  That is a lot of noise removal.  So the final image is this.

This was a learning adventure.  And it works for me.

Juvenile Eagle on a Branch

Spring is on the way.  Nothing confirms that fact like a very un-Michigan like cloudless day and seasonal low 40s temp.  Just beautiful.  I didn't need much coaxing from a club friend when asked if I wanted to chase some Eagles.
I've been living in mid-Michigan for close to 25 years.  And I'm now finding out that our county park system has areas of 'wilderness' where the wild critters live.  And along with the critters are the Eagles.  Less than 10 miles from the house, with some luck, I'll get to see something more exciting than a sea gull.
Today would also be a great day to experiment with different auto focus modes.  I had visions of using all the modes that follow a target in flight, because I'd be watching Eagles in flight.  Right?
The good news is I did use more than one AF mode.  But what really happened was the AF caught all the branches around me.  I really didn't have a clearing to work from.  Again, I learned a lot.  Sometimes less technology works better.  Single point would have worked much better.
And as to photographing birds in flight, well I have a long way to go.
Although I had only a few good shots, being outdoors and seeing these birds in flight, it was a no lose deal.
This image will not win any prizes, but this is a personal success story.  I can't judge distance, other than to say very far away.  And it is a very aggressive crop.  But this goes up as a spring is here tribute.
The settings:

(Note to self, change clock time.  It was really 5:30 ish.)
I was using Manual Mode with Auto ISO.  Just happened to work out to ISO 100.  The focal length says 300, but combined with the D500, it is effectively 450 mm.
As is recorded, the AF was dynamic.  And this is the target the camera hit.

Close.  Again, it was really far away.
When I'm working to convince myself I either need/don't need a bigger lens, I think for airshows I have enough with 450 mm.  But If I'm going take the bird/nature thing seriously 450 mm just isn't enough.

There's a lot of blue there.  Won't be printing many of these, the ink balance would not be maintained.
But it is a magnificent creature on a great looking day.

Santa Fe at Dorrance Station

This is the first of the photo stacks from the DMRRC 2019 shoot.  I like the Santa Fe 330 engine.  Actually, I like all the colors on the engines, and one that I'll look at later that looks very weathered.  But for now the reds, yellows and silver of the Santa Fe are on display.
This is an eleven shot stack.  Somewhere around shot five, the train was moved.  Fortunately, the train was moved in a backward direction.  And fortunately I have good images of the train before it was moved.
Fortunately.
In all the previous stacking projects I've done, I've pretty much let the software do its thing and that was good enough.  Here was a challenge.
The basic settings:

When I did the original eleven shot stack, this was the best I (the software) could do with respect to the train.

If the ultimate goal is a sharp image, that ain't it.
So I decided to blend a five shot stack to get the sharp train and blended it in the final eleven shot stack.

Tough to tell, but the images are different.
After I had the two together, and a little cleanup.  This is my finished effort.

There is a lot going on here, and I like it.  The blue background is what the walls in the club look like now.  To go much further with this, I'd have to think of something.  And with any luck, the club will have something on the wall next year.
And the painted version.

Both will make wonderful screen backgrounds.

Detroit Model Railroad Shoot - 2019

Yesterday was the Club's annual photo shoot at the Detroit Model Railroad Club's location.  I think this is the fourth year we've done this.
First, four of my images from 2018 were chosen for the 2019 calendar.  Very happy to see the work is appreciated by others.
That was the good part of the day, the rest seemingly went downhill from there.  But as the noted philosopher Yoda noted years in the future, "The greatest teacher failure is".  And so as it goes with most of my life's education, by the end of the day, I learned a lot.
First, my coordination with other people needs work.  People skills.  Also doing some camera work were some members of the DMRRC.  I should have explained what I was doing with stacking and the process.  While I was stacking, some trains were moved, some flash shots went, and well, challenges come in many forms.  I will have to overcome.  To be very clear, this was my issue, no one else's.
And then there was my choice of camera.
All week prior to the shoot, I told myself to use the D7200.  The connection to the tablet via Bluetooth works, the images are very good.  A proven performer for this event.  And then I said, well let's try the D500.  And as the noted philosopher Homer (Simpson) philosophed, "Doh!".
Well, I guess I had to try.  
I had put a quick release on the shoulder straps of the D7200.  Must have been a reason for that?  Ha, well that was an unexpected source of frustration.  That shoulder strap was a pain.
Then there was the tethering from the camera to the tablet.  The D7200 has a great simple WiFi set up.  The D500 was set up to use Snapbridge.  If I have one issue with the D500, it is the network is way too proprietary.  Snapbridge and I are not friends.  That is another post in itself, but I made the conscious decision to bypass WiFi for a cable.  I chuckle at my foolish thoughts.
For some reason, and I will find out, but my stacking didn't read the NEF files from the D500.  This is not an issue with the D7200.  That mistake could have been a real disaster, except I was also creating JPG files.  And in large format.  Luck comes in many flavors.  And for the failure/teacher part, I have to work with JPGs.  I worked on a stack this morning, and Yoda would be proud.  I overcame the file format issue, JPGs work just fine.  I also overcame the train moving and it turned out OK.  That post will follow with the story.
All in all, through my failures I have learned a lot.  I didn't leave with as many stacks as I usually walk away with so I'll have to work with single shot images.  
On a more positive note, I did get some shots with ISOs over 10k.  Will be interesting to see how they turned out.
More learning.  

Heron in the Green (?) - Paint

After looking at the Heron in the Green image for a while, I thought a paint take might look good.  I laughed a bit, as most of the green was gone.  But this would look good in a smaller print - and would certainly would beg the question if it was real - or painted.

What happened to all the green?

Jack Links Climbing

Reviewing some of the images from Reno, getting ready for the summer season.  I saw this one of the Jack Links bi-plane.  For more of the Jack Links story and my attachment to some of the parts used in this unique aircraft, read here.  
This image is severely cropped, maybe to less than 20%.  It won't win any prizes, but looks good on the monitor.
But what really gets me is the prop blur.  And the sky background.  This was at the far end of my reach, 450 mm.   And really cropped.  Like all images, if it stars as crap, nothing you can do will help.  But, if your image is in focus you can get away with a lot.  And I think I did.
The settings:

I need to remember f/8 and 1/500 sec for future shots.  The prop is just about perfect for me with this one.  I can live with f/8.  For planning purposes, I can go to f/11.  But this far out, F/8 is pretty sharp.

It looks good on the monitor.  And for now, good enough.

Heron in the Green

As the temperatures crawled into the mid-50s today, I started thinking of visiting my feathered friends in a few weeks.  It's been a few weeks since I've opened up some of these programs, tough to get in the picture mood when the wind chill is at 0 and the days are so short.
I've not been totally forgetting about photography over the last few weeks.  I've done some work with a variable neutral density filter at a near by man made waterfall before it froze over.  If I elect to use a ND filter for my airshow work, at this time it won't be a VND.  I found a lot of color shift.  It could be fixed, but why add to the post processing.
Last weekend the sun was out on a Saturday, that I didn't have to do the real job, so I hit the road.  I hit a few lighthouses.  My plan was to take a number of JPG images and see how they compared to my processing of a RAW image.  Long story short, Nikon's JPG just doesn't do it for me.  My processing for anything I'd want to show still includes ACR so I'm not really saving that much time.  The RAW file size hasn't been an issue in the D7200 so far.  So unless I get trapped into some 'vacation' photos, I'll be shooting RAW.
So back to the Heron.  I like this image because it is busy.  Busy to me anyway.  Some of the image is artfully out of focus.  And the bird is in focus.  You can really see the yellow eye.

Settings:

I'm still a few weeks away from going to the Refuge, but the season is on the way.

Gull on a Rail

Way back in August of 2009, I was the proud owner of a Nikon D80.  And as mentioned before, I had no idea how to use the thing.  And to prove that point....
*Road Trip*
I've downloaded Nikon's free photo editor.  I'll probably never use it to edit anything, but my real goal was to have an OEM tool to read XMP file information.  This helps when I'm going down memory lane.  And it is much easier to read than Adobe products RAW file viewer. 
*Road Tip Over*
So in August of 2009, I was in North Carolina.  Part of the day's trip was to take a ferry across a lot of water from somewhere to Fort Fisher.  Near the end of the  venture when we were back in the car ready to exit, right outside the car landed a sea gull.  I flipped the camera toward the bird and whoosh.  Moment captured in time.  Instant professional photographer.  Auto mode, kit lens and all.  
Back when life was much simpler, I thought this was a great shot.  OK, colors were a bit flat out of the camera.  (Had no idea why I was shooting RAW at that time.)  The bird's white shoulder is really close to being totally blown.  But other than that, the red piping, the black metal siding, the detail of the rope and the white lettering was in my opinion 'da bomb'.
Over the years, I've used this photograph in my printed portfolio as a beginning point in my artistic journey.
*Another Road Trip*
The photo club to which I am a member is trying a new activity.  Members offer up photos to the group, and everyone get a shot at how they'd post process the image.  I though this one would be interesting as there are many aspects one could choose based on interests.  And so I thought I'd publish my efforts. 
*Road Trip Over*

The settings:

See the Programmed Auto - yes we all have to start somewhere.

The RAW Image:

What I thought would be good years ago, from the original PSD file:

So I have some darker blue in the sky, but at the cost of a blue 'reflection' in the black metal.  And I see I have changed the colors of the bird, and not in a good way.  Blow it up just a little and my new nemesis, noise, is really in the metal.  I have areas to attack.
With old standby software, and some new software this is what I did.  
I'm trying to update my workflow with AI Clear.  Does it come early?, does it come late?  I'm on day 9 of the trial still trying to figure it out.  But in this case, AIC was more in the beginning. 
The workflow:
1. Single RAW image to Photomatix, Soft 4 preset.  This balanced the light levels for me.  With that much black and faded sky, with the white bird, Photomatix handle the independent levels much better that PS.  
2. AI Clear - hit it with the Max setting.
3. ACR Edits.  Usually some form of straightening, spot removal and in this case I used a graduated filter to darken the sky up a bit.
4. Topaz Detail.  So playing around with this product, I removed any remaining noise to really smooth out the metal and increased the black to remove the 'blue' haze that was introduced earlier.  Very neat little tool.
5.  A better crop.
And this is what I came up with, 8.5 years later.

I'm still not totally happy with the sky, but it is what it is.  If I remember right, it was a cloudless day with lots of vapor haze.  Maybe something I will fix in another 8 years.

Two Real Close

From the Reno Air Races, I found I focused on shots where there were more than one aircraft in the frame.  Helps with the whole picture tells a story thing.  
When photographing the Patriots demo team, I would often not get close enough to the subject to get a good shot.  And that is the case here.  This shot was taken at 277 mm.  There's a lot more lens I could have used.  Rookie mistake.
I've already worked most of the can't miss efforts from that trip , so now working with the reach projects.
And project is an understatement for this one.  I've been working for three days on this.  I tried On one, Gigapixel, DeNoise and PS.  And what wound up working in the end is AI Clear - just confirming what I've found before.
So here is the original RAW image.

ISO 800, f/6.3, 1/8000 sec, 227 mm

NIKON D7200 Ver.1.04/70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

For me, this will require a super aggressive crop to be interesting.  Even if I wanted to get three subjects in the frame, it would still require a aggressive crop.  But I want the two to fill the frame.   At that tight a crop at ISO 800, from new experience gained, that nice sky will not be the same.  This is precisely why I started searching for a product to help smooth out the sky without destroying the rest of the image.
Here is the cropped product.

This won't win any sharpness awards and barely passes the monitor test, but it will make my screen saver rotation.  The good news is that AIC did exactly what I wanted it to do.  Sky looks great and a lot of the air craft graphics are sharp.  For some reason, the 3 on this side is off color.  What had me going for a few days was I could get the sky right, but the PATRIOTS graphic would never clear up.  Its natural silver reflective flak with red outline was no help at all.  Seriously, no help.  The missing piece turned out to be Topaz's Detail.  Just a little slider here, a little slider there and the image (graphics) improved greatly.  (Turns out I purchased Detail some number of years ago, who knew?)
So, note to self, get the frame right the first time and you won't have over software to get the shot you want.

Heron on Log - Part II

I had posted this image a few months ago.  Lots of brown stuff, green stuff and some yellow.  And I never pass up a log.  The bird is OK too.
When I posted this before, I wasn't sure of what type of bird it was - and now I know these are herons.
The original post is here.
This is the original posed image:

As I remember, at the time I really liked this image.  I was just getting into the 'bird' scene.
This one shows up well on the monitor.  It was taken at 1.3 image size with the 70-300 lens.  There a lot of math involved there, but it was relatively far away.  It is one of the few shots taken with the 1.3 image size that actually shows up well on the monitor.
So today I was looking for images to test the AI Clear filter and tried it on this one.  My purpose of the AIC filter is primarily noise reduction.  Not much visible noise in this image.  But on the image the sharpening/smoothing was fantastic.  I could crop in a bit more.  This is what I got today with AIC added to the workflow.

Outside of the AIC, I deepened the colors a bit more.  For focusing purposes, I keyed on the eye.  In this scenario, I hit the image with AIC first, then continued with ACR.  At the end though, I didn't need On One to finish up with sharpening.  I did try some dynamic contrast - but that didn't do much either.  So no On One with this one.
Maybe my eyes have adjusted a bit better over the last few months?

Topaz AI Clear

Continuing the search for help with noise removal, I've started looking at Topaz's AI Clear.  
Currently this is $60 ish.  And the 15% discount coupons can be found everywhere.
That's the bad news, because everything else is good.
I've been working with PS - the RAW filter and it's pretty good.  I worked with On One's noise reduction and really wasn't that impressed.  And then I stumbled on the AI Clear.
My quick test against PS.

AI Clear on the left, PS on the right.  In the flat background, much smoother.  Truth be told, I could get almost the same effect with PS, but unless I did some masking and layering I would have 'smoothed' the entire critter and lost some of the great detail.  What doesn't show and what is really great about the product, the detail on the critter 'sharpens'.  I guess that is the AI part, Artificial Intelligence.  For this test with AIC, I used only the default settings.
Easy decision on this.

Topaz AI Gigapixel

In the quest for cutting down noise, I came across Topaz's AI Gigapixel.  The advertising line is that this product will enlarge any image a bunch.  There are plenty of Youtube videos.
For my purposes, I'd like to be more aggressive in my cropping.  I haven't had any requests to blow up an image to wall size.  Yet.
Did I mention, I really like products with 30 full trials?
So my test image is part of one I took last fall, that of a grass hopper that hitched a ride on the hood of the truck while riding through Shiawassee Nature Refuge.
This original post/story is here.
This is the image:

So I took a small slice of this image and blew it up 400%.  I used PS, in one leap, and AIG.  I understand that PS will do a much better job of expanding an image if done in steps, but there is a time element in this.
My findings:

OK - to see the difference is noticeable at 400% magnification.  Is it at a normal size?  Not so much, but my use would be aggressive crop.  There's a pretty big difference.
Now, is it worth the cost?  The product is $100 - and there are plenty of 15% off coupons for Topaz products floating around.   I have plenty of time to decide, only on day 3 of the evaluation.

Broadwing Hawk - Eyes on Eyes

One of the best series of shot from last year's trips to the Nature Refuge was the Broadwing Hawk.  The story to get here.
I like this shot looking straight on.
This is as far as I can reach.  The effect mm is 600 on this shot and in the original the subject is very small.
One of the 'creative criticisms' I received this year from the photo club is my nature subjects were not large enough in the image.  Some of my framing issues were with, well framing.  Not in this case, because I was at the limit of the equipment.  (Planning to resolve this issue!)
The original:

ISO 640, f/5.6, 1/800 sec, 600 mm

NIKON D7200 Ver.1.04/70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

I guess that's OK for a travel photo, but I want to see the bird.

That's better and it easily passes the monitor test.
I'm playing with a Topaz product, AI Clear.  In the past few weeks, I've been going after noise reduction.  I've been playing with Photoshop and On One.  I really like PS's ARE noise reduction.  I can see it.  I struggled with On One's version, which is usually not the case.  I've been reading about Topaz's suite of products from a number on UHH forum members so giving AI Clear a shot.  (I love full edition 30 day trials.)  So this image has so Topaz in it.  And it is good.

Two Too Close

I have more than a few shots that I didn't frame well, or didn't have enough reach with the lens.  The final test is can I crop enough to get a good image on a 23 inch monitor - and get a good image on a 23 inch monitor.
What follows is completely un-scientific.  The question is - is crop processing on the original image to a small section give a better image or increase the size of the image then crop to the size required for the monitor test?
For the D7200, a normal image size is 20 x 13.33 Inches.  So what if the image was enlarged say 400%?  To 80 x 53.33 inches?
I've tried what I would call aggressive cropping in some of the nature images and they didn't turn out very well on the monitor.  If you know what you were looking for you could see the pixels.  Damn gaming monitor.
Anyway, I thought maybe the algorithms to enlarge the image would be different than to shrink.  Worth a shot, eh?
This image followed that path.  It was enlarged to 400%, then cropped to 6.4 x 3.6 inches.
This is the original image.

This is the RAW image so a bit on the bland side.  But this is for the relative size of the subjects.
And this would be the final image, blow'd up and cropped close.

ISO 800, f/6.3, 1/8000 sec, 165 mm

NIKON D7200 Ver.1.04/70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6

Spare me the frozen prop stuff, already know it.  And a had a lot more lens to use, so framing could have been better.  It has occurred to me that because of the high speed, that this process was helped a bit.  So I'll look for a slower shot and see what happens.